As I head to Ivoryton..

I'm about to head to Ivoryton, CT for a week-long camp with high schoolers from independent schools across the east coast, but I saw this headline this morning: "Israel launches airstrikes on Gaza, 155 dead." The escalating violence that Gaza and Israel has witnessed is too much. Israel squeezed Gaza into a humanitarian crisis, and now it does this? This airstrike will only cause more rockets to flow into Israel, not less.

I remember when the last major airstrike happened less than a year ago. I was headed to church with some Norwegian friends of mine, crossing through downtown Ramallah, when we were stopped in our tracks by protesting children - in solidarity for the many children killed over the weekend in Gaza. On our way back from church, as we crossed a checkpoint, the smell of burning tires and the sound of Israeli soldier's "preventive" bullets filled the air.

This airstrike will only cause more death and violence. Though I studied political science and spent close to half a year in Palestine I know I could be the last one to advise what to do. All I ask for is prayers for the many that are suffering, that the Christians I know living there would not be overwhelmed, and that God would have mercy on this region and on my friends who live there. (these are pictures taken recently of some of them).

Title Change

I just changed the title of my blog. I'd been playing around with different title names, and landed on this - I'm pretty much settled in Connecticut now for the time being, and also am no longer currently learning Arabic (however I would jump at the chance to do so again). "Fadi" is a word I continue to hold dear. It means REDEEMER - and that is definitely a theme that I clung to over this past year. I renamed my blog GRACE UPON GRACE not only after John 1:16, but because it sums up many things we discuss in my homegroup. We began the year discussing how we need God's grace for various things - for reflection, for processing, for thinking ahead for our future (everyone in our group is a former "missionary" of some sort). We also discussed how God gives us His grace to lead us into different stations in life. When I think about it - there's no way I could pick up and move to the West Bank right now (even though I'd LOVE to) - however a year ago, God's grace gave me the fullness to go ahead and do the work He'd set out for me to do, and provided everything that was needed - including physical and spiritual support. His grace also provided for me to come on staff with FOCUS this past summer. It's definitely a mystery how this works, but I continue to see this grace clearly at work to lead and sustain.

P.S. The picture was taken after an ice storm that hit upstate NY when I was up at the Emma Willard school for a visit.

Psalm 12

(As taken from Patrick Henry Reardon's "Christ in the Psalms," pp. 23, 24)

The idea is now common that the primary purpose of speech is communication, the sharing of ideas, impressions, and feelings with one another. Language is currently considered to be, first of all, social and therefore completely subject to social control. Human speech is widely interpreted as a matter of arbitrary and accepted fashion, subject to the same vagaries as any other fashion. Thus, the senses of words can be changed at will, different meanings being imposed by the same sorts of forces that determine whether other tastes happen to be in vogue. Words become alterable as hemlines and hats.

According to this view, words are necessarily taken to mean whatever the present living members of a society say that they mean, so that the study of language really becomes a branch of sociology. In fact, sociology textbooks themselves make this claim explicitly. Moreover, this notion of speech is so taken for granted nowadays as to nearly assume the rank of a self-evident principle. Nonetheless, it is deeply erroneous.

It is also egregiously dangerous to spiritual and mental health, for such a view of language dissolves the relationship of speech to the perception of truth, rendering man the lord of language without affirming the magisterial claims of truth over man. Declared independent of such claims, language sumbits to no tribunal higher than arbitrary social dictates. Human society, no matter how sinful and deceived, is named the final authority over speech, which is responsible only to those who use it, subject to no standards above the merely social. That is to say, in this view words must mean what people determine them to mean, especically such people as cultural engineers, political activists, feminist reformers, news commentators, talk-show hosts, and other professionals who make their living by fudging the truth.

This current notion of language was well formulated in the declaration of the proud and rebellious in Psalm 11 (Hebrew 12), in a passage manifestly portending the mendacious times in which we live: 'With our tongue we will prevail. Our lips are our own; who is lord over us?'

How different is the view of the Bible, where speech is not regarded, first and foremost, as a form of communication among human beings. In fact, Adam was already talking before ever Eve appeared. Human speech, that is to say, appears in Holy Scripture, earlier than the creation of the second human being, for we find Adam already naming the animals prior to the arrival of the marvelous creature that God later formed from his rib.

At the beginning, before the Fall, Man was possessed of an accurate perception into reality. He was able to name the animals because he could perceive precisely what they were. His words expressed true insight, a ravishing gaze at glory, a contemplation of real forms, so that the very structure and composition of his mind took on the seal and assumed the formal stamp of truth. Human language then was a reflection of that divine light with which heaven and earth are full. The speech of unfallen man was but the voice of vision.

This primeval human language, the pure progeny of lustrous discernment, flowed already forth from the lips of Adam prior to the creation of Eve, who heard it for the first time when her husband, awakening from his mystic sleep, identified her and told her exactly who she was: 'You are bone of my bone, and flesh of my flesh.' Human speech was already rooted in the vision of truth before it became the expression of human communication.

Moreover, the Fall itself, when it came, derived from that demonic disassociation of speech from truth that we call a Lie: 'You will not surely die.' Eve's acquiesence in that first lie was mankind's original act of metaphysical rebellion. It had more to do with the garbling of Babel than with the garden of Eden. It was human language's first declaration of independence: 'Our lips are our own; who is lord over us?'

Just as truthful speech streams forth from vision, springing from the font of a pure heart, so lying is conceived in the duplicitous heart before it issues from the mouth. Says Psalm 12: 'Each one has spoken follies to his neighbor, deceitful lips have spoken with a divided heart.' The situation described here is so bad that one despairs of finding any truths left in human discourse: 'Save me, O God, for the godly man has disappeared, because truths are diminished among the sons of men.... The wicked prowl on every side."

In contrast to these varied, seemingly universal lies of men stand the reliable words of God: 'The words of the Lord are pure words, smelted silver purged of dross, purified seven times.' In this very unveracious world we yet trust that, though heaven and earth pass away, His words will never pass away.

(Fr. Patrick Henry Reardon is pastor of All Saints Antiochian Orthodox Church in Chicago, Illinois, and a Senior Editor of Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity.)